Today, I find myself enjoying music much more than I did in sometime. I don't ignore or dislike music at other times, but I find myself sometimes less enthused by it. Maybe its got something to do with the fact that there are expectations attached to the act of listening to music. There is always a judgement made about the type of music one listens to and tagging involved. I sometimes find myself doing it, until I remember some of the things I find myself enjoying at the oddest moments....
Anyway, there are people who turn up their noses at what is deemed popular music, and I agree with them in most cases, until I hate myself for humming Justin Beiber. Because I'm not supposed to like him. He's a whiny kid and his music is factory generated and empty. Nothing, wholesome and cottage industry like about it.
So, I stick with my most common defense. I love music. Of all sorts. Except for the ones which I don't. But things I don't like tend to run to particular songs, not genres. And isn't there some sort of war going on about cutting edge and the deconstruction of the definition of cutting edge meaning it has no definite genres?
So, in the recent acquisition of the iPod number 'n', I have been selecting music of suited to my present mood and feelings and listening to it for hours on end. This a fairly normal thing to do for everyone else. But I am a relative novice to it, since I had never mastered the habit of having headphones in my ears at all times. I'd rather have my eyes squinting into a book. I equate both these acts of habit in the same category. Anyway, when I was selecting the music that would go into the damned Pod, I came across Portishead in my collection. The entire discography. I seemed to remember that I had downloaded it on a whim, when I had just heard one song (predictably "glorybox"). I hadn't tried to suss out if I'd like their other songs or not, before acquiring everything they did. So, I did what I do when it comes to books I think I should read because I aught to know them, as opposed to being genuinely interested. I put the damn thing into the iPod, and let it surprise me on shuffle.
The thing is I tried. I really tried. And I completely abhor most of it. It is so jarring and not-music-like and i'm afraid to use this word, "experimental", that I cannot find any common thing in it to make it embed itself in my mind. I made myself sit through about five of them, and tried very hard to stop myself from changing tracks as fast as my fingers could. But I really don't understand the music. Its too jarring, and non-musical. Somewhere in my head I have this notion that music should be melodic and well, musical. I can appreciate concept. In fact I think I have an unhealthy fascination for Concept. This is probably what leads me into listing things that I should listen to, even if I have no idea if they fit into my visceral idea of what music should be.
Still, I do listen to things that feels good to my ears. Hence I am not afraid of bopping my head to somethings which would be classified by the upturned-noses as deep and critically pink pop. I enjoy it. It makes me work. If its got a good bassline trip going, I'm there. I don't need it to be Victor Wooten. I'm satisfied with James Blunt- "1973".
Its like catholic guilt, this need to appear knowledgeable and different from the rest of the populace by what in our own heads must be this deep conviction in our exceptionally pure and perfect taste in music. Its just our need to have a place where we stand out in shining celebrity when lacking in anything resembling good looks or pompom cheering capacities ( yes I hated myself the moment I said that, so don't say anything). Hence the war of wants and needs continues. I want to bop my head. But I need to know if what I want is intellectually high end or not. Dammit. Anyway, I'm beyond caring.
I like this song:
I've always loved her a little, P!nk. Because she's pop. But bad ass. And did a fucking awesomely badass version of Bohemian Rhapsody. And can sing. And basically has a sense of humor. Add Nate Ruess into the equation. His voice has captured my current intellectual imagination. From the time I heard Fun's "Carry On". Its classic. Has a bit of Freddy Mercury's range and feel. But entirely unique me thinks. So both my wants and needs have been fulfilled. And the live version is powerful as well:
And to appease my visual side and my stalky side: a video reccomended by Craig Ferguson-
I love the story in the video. Its so stupidly funny and sweet. And the songs cool too.
So thats, my first ever music post. :|
Anyway, there are people who turn up their noses at what is deemed popular music, and I agree with them in most cases, until I hate myself for humming Justin Beiber. Because I'm not supposed to like him. He's a whiny kid and his music is factory generated and empty. Nothing, wholesome and cottage industry like about it.
So, I stick with my most common defense. I love music. Of all sorts. Except for the ones which I don't. But things I don't like tend to run to particular songs, not genres. And isn't there some sort of war going on about cutting edge and the deconstruction of the definition of cutting edge meaning it has no definite genres?
So, in the recent acquisition of the iPod number 'n', I have been selecting music of suited to my present mood and feelings and listening to it for hours on end. This a fairly normal thing to do for everyone else. But I am a relative novice to it, since I had never mastered the habit of having headphones in my ears at all times. I'd rather have my eyes squinting into a book. I equate both these acts of habit in the same category. Anyway, when I was selecting the music that would go into the damned Pod, I came across Portishead in my collection. The entire discography. I seemed to remember that I had downloaded it on a whim, when I had just heard one song (predictably "glorybox"). I hadn't tried to suss out if I'd like their other songs or not, before acquiring everything they did. So, I did what I do when it comes to books I think I should read because I aught to know them, as opposed to being genuinely interested. I put the damn thing into the iPod, and let it surprise me on shuffle.
The thing is I tried. I really tried. And I completely abhor most of it. It is so jarring and not-music-like and i'm afraid to use this word, "experimental", that I cannot find any common thing in it to make it embed itself in my mind. I made myself sit through about five of them, and tried very hard to stop myself from changing tracks as fast as my fingers could. But I really don't understand the music. Its too jarring, and non-musical. Somewhere in my head I have this notion that music should be melodic and well, musical. I can appreciate concept. In fact I think I have an unhealthy fascination for Concept. This is probably what leads me into listing things that I should listen to, even if I have no idea if they fit into my visceral idea of what music should be.
Still, I do listen to things that feels good to my ears. Hence I am not afraid of bopping my head to somethings which would be classified by the upturned-noses as deep and critically pink pop. I enjoy it. It makes me work. If its got a good bassline trip going, I'm there. I don't need it to be Victor Wooten. I'm satisfied with James Blunt- "1973".
Its like catholic guilt, this need to appear knowledgeable and different from the rest of the populace by what in our own heads must be this deep conviction in our exceptionally pure and perfect taste in music. Its just our need to have a place where we stand out in shining celebrity when lacking in anything resembling good looks or pompom cheering capacities ( yes I hated myself the moment I said that, so don't say anything). Hence the war of wants and needs continues. I want to bop my head. But I need to know if what I want is intellectually high end or not. Dammit. Anyway, I'm beyond caring.
I like this song:
I've always loved her a little, P!nk. Because she's pop. But bad ass. And did a fucking awesomely badass version of Bohemian Rhapsody. And can sing. And basically has a sense of humor. Add Nate Ruess into the equation. His voice has captured my current intellectual imagination. From the time I heard Fun's "Carry On". Its classic. Has a bit of Freddy Mercury's range and feel. But entirely unique me thinks. So both my wants and needs have been fulfilled. And the live version is powerful as well:
And to appease my visual side and my stalky side: a video reccomended by Craig Ferguson-
I love the story in the video. Its so stupidly funny and sweet. And the songs cool too.
So thats, my first ever music post. :|